Landlords to bear letting fee costs
Thursday 15 November 2018
Growing numbers of property managers are announcing that they will be replacing letting fees with new charges for landlords.
By Miriam Bell
Letting fees were banned by Parliament earlier this month, with the ban due to come into effect from 12 December this year.
Housing Minister Phil Twyford, who says that letting fees are unfair to tenants, estimates the ban could put up to $47 million into the pockets of Kiwi families each year.
Over the last few days, many of the larger property management companies – including Quinovic Group, Crockers Property Management, and Barfoot & Thompson – have confirmed they will now be passing letting costs on to landlords.
All say they need to cover the time and costs associated with finding and placing new tenants, but descriptions of, and approaches to, the new charges vary.
While Quinovic plans to charge landlords a "tenancy fee", which would be a flat rate of $550 plus GST, Crockers are opting for an "admin fee" of $20 a month for landlords - charged regardless of whether a tenancy changed or not.
Barfoot & Thompson are still finalising their plans while others are likely to simply increase the percentage commission they take from the rent each week.
But there is a high likelihood that the new charges will ultimately be passed on to tenants in the form of higher rents.
Both the NZ Property Investors Federation (NZPIF) and the Real Estate Institute of NZ have long warned this could happen, while MBIE officials also advised Government that it was a risk.
NZPIF executive officer Andrew King says it is reasonable to assume that property managers will recoup the cost of not being able to charge tenants a letting fee by passing the fee onto landlords.
“That means tenants will still probably end up paying the letting fee, although indirectly.”
Further, tenants are likely to end up paying more over time, he says.
“The MBIE officials advised that if landlords responded by raising rents, the likely increase in rent would be $9.99 per week.
“Given that the average tenancy is around two years, this would mean that tenants actually end up paying more than the original cost of the letting fee.
“Although the cost would be spread out rather than being the current large and up-front letting fee.”
King says this situation shows that simply banning a practice doesn’t always result in the intended outcome.
The NZPIF believes that whoever receives the benefit of the property manager’s service should be the one who pays the letting fee.
Landlords who let their own properties, rather than using property managers, will not be affected by either the ban or by the planned new charges.
It's also worth noting that not all property managers charge letting fees.
Comments from our readers
Sign In / Register to add your comment
It’s been a spectacular run for the market but this property cycle has done its dash and recent positive developments aren’t likely to cause a major upturn, one top economist says.
Auckland house price expectations have turned negative for the first time since 2009 with a new ASB survey turning in a gloomy outlook on the market.
Technology and changes to the way people work are set to transform the commercial property sector and investors need to be attuned to these developments.
The latest Reserve Bank lending data reveals investors borrowed more than $1 billion in March, the highest figure since November, but a 10% fall on the same period last year.