Letting fees to go

Thursday 22 March 2018

Government moves to ban letting fees may not benefit tenants as much as they think, industry experts say.

By Miriam Bell

Housing Minister Phil Twyford today introduced legislation into Parliament which will ban the charging of letting fees to tenants.

Twyford, who describes letting fees as an “unjustifiable tax on renters”, says the move could make a real difference to struggling families.

There are significant costs associated with moving to a new rental property, which many families are now forced to do every year, he says.

“When moving into a new rental property, tenants can face up to four weeks’ bond, two weeks’ rent in advance – and one weeks’ rent as a letting fee – in addition to moving costs.

“Banning the charging of letting fees to tenants is a good first step in improving the life of renters, while we continue our broader review of the Residential Tenancies Act.”

Twyford doesn’t believe rents will rise in response to the ban – and neither does the NZ Property Investors Federation.

NZPIF executive officer Andrew King says a significant increase in rents in response to the ban seems unlikely but that they are, none the less, opposed to the ban.

“We believe tenants should have the flexibility to choose whether or not they pay letting fees, as they do now.

“That because when rental properties are in short supply being willing to pay a letting fee can give tenants access to more properties and put them a step ahead of other tenants.”

King says the potential impact of the ban, including cost savings, is hard to quantify.

“While about two thirds of private rental properties are managed by the property owner, who is not legally allowed to charge a letting fee, some landlords use letting agents to find tenants.

“On top of this, some property managers don’t charge letting fees, and the combination of these factors means there is no way of knowing how often letting fees are actually charged.”

However, At Home Property Management’s Gregory Young believes the ban could result in higher property management costs that will be passed on to tenants.

“Taking away a one-off letting fee will simply end up with extra costs being added to the weekly rent. And that is likely to result in tenants’ paying more than they would have with a one-off fee.

“So if the government wants to save tenants money by doing this, it won’t. The cost is likely to come back on tenants.”

The government’s RTA review will look at changes intended to benefit tenants, like limiting rent increases to once a year and initiatives to improve security of tenure.

Twyford expects the resulting legislation to be introduced into Parliament by the end of the year.

Read more:

Rental squeeze to intensify 

No go for rent controls 

Comments from our readers

On 23 March 2018 at 8:19 am Property Leader said:
One disturbing factor is the Government has not said what percentage of properties are managed. Sure Andrew King and a few others say two thirds are self managed but where is the evidence for this. MBIE knows the figure from the bond lodgements but they are not saying. Law changes need to be based on facts not guess work and assumptions.

Sign In / Register to add your comment

Property News

Homesellers required to provide IRD number

Investors who flip properties are currently subject to the bright line test, but owner-occupiers are not. That is now set to change.

House Prices

Market rebound coming - Westpac

The cancellation of a capital gains tax combined with lower mortgage rates will be game changing for the housing market, believes Westpac’s chief economist.

Commercial

Transforming commercial investment

Many investors are switching from residential to commercial property and now a new platform aims to makes access to the sector easier.

Mortgages

Investor lending weak in March

The latest Reserve Bank lending data reveals investors borrowed more than $1 billion in March, the highest figure since November, but a 10% fall on the same period last year.

Site by PHP Developer