Property Management

Methamphetamine use doesn’t mean eviction

A landlord who wanted to evict a tenant because of possible methamphetamine use by two flatmates has been slapped down by the Tenancy Tribunal.

Wednesday, May 12th 2021

The tenant’s two flatmates had been arrested at the premises in December last year by police citing firearms and drugs offences.

Although the tenant was at the flat, he was not involved nor was he arrested. He was then given a 14-day notice by the landlord to evict the two flatmates. This was done.

A composite methamphetamine test immediately arranged by the landlord confirmed the presence of the drug. No detailed test was carried out.

However, the landlord applied to the tribunal to evict the tenant on the grounds the breach of the tenancy agreement was incapable of remedy.

He claimed the tenant used the premises unlawfully, by using or allowing another person to use methamphetamine on the property.

The tribunal found there was no legal requirement to apply the New Zealand Standard for Testing and Decontamination of Methamphetamine Contaminated Properties in the landlord’s case for eviction of the tenant.

Arguing the tenant left the premises unsafe was a challenge for the landlord, said the tribunal, as the residues evidenced by the composite test did not prove it more than likely there were excesses above the level adopted as safe.

“The residue itself is an unseen chemical, not that dissimilar to other possible residual contaminants like nicotine or chemicals from harsh cleaning products.”

The tribunal cited Professor Sir Peter Gluckman’s 2018 report determining there was little evidence supporting health risks from exposure to residue from methamphetamine consumption.

His report says in the absence of other evidence of manufacture, any levels below 15μg/100cm² are highly unlikely to present adverse effects therefore there should be no need for remediation.

Recent decisions from the tribunal have found, based on the Gluckman report, landlords have been unable to prove methamphetamine contamination below 15μg/100cm² poses a health risk and therefore amounts to damage.

In its decision, the tribunal says it did not find the tenant intentionally permitted the premises to be used unlawfully.

“He responded to the 14-day notice to remove the offenders and he was absent at work for much of the time, making it reasonably possible he was unaware of the activities of the others until the police involvement. It would be inequitable to make an order terminating the tenancy.”

The tribunal ordered costs incurred in having the composite test done be paid by the tenant.


On Wednesday, May 12th 2021 9:39 am Peter Lewis said:

Yet, back in 2016, the benchmark level was set at 0.5 micrograms of methamphetamine per 100 of surface area. This was based on the guidelines for the remediation of methamphetamine laboratory sites as published in 2010 and was being applied to all contamination sites. Should the contamination be assessed as above benchmark levels then remedial action had to be taken. The landlord could not rent out a property that is contaminated. If they did so they were breaching their obligations under the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 as well as in other legislation such as the Building Act and the Health Act. Landlords were penalized, and in some cases ordered to pay compensation for furniture that tenants were ‘forced’ to destroy because of that contamination. How things have changed in five years!

On Wednesday, May 12th 2021 10:46 pm Kevin Edmunds said:

No problem if contamination is below 15. Mind you this is not in keeping with the NZ Standard. The Government provided rules for the GG to provide a rule but the GG has not done so and so the result is a defacto standard due to the Gluckman report. Gluckmans report was a literature search so over time literature may view this differently but as soon as the Minister of Housing said Housing NZ would adopt this the Tribunal decided it would also adopt it despite there being a legitimate rule in NZ Standards at 1.5.

On Monday, May 31st 2021 12:57 am Peter Hall said:

I believe it is more complicated as OSH regulations reference the NZ standard so it would be breaking the OSH rules to allow a contractor or employee [ i.e. plumber or Property Manager] to enter a property with more than 0.5 micrograms per 100 of meth contamination. I don't know if OSH has prosecuted but certainly a Contractor or Employee would have the right to know and or complain to OSH if they were exposed to Meth levels above 0.5 /100 I think Housing NZ get around this by just not testing, but that's not really much of a defense against a potential OSH prosecution for a Private Landlord.

On Tuesday, June 01st 2021 4:27 am Paul murch said:

so the nearly $30K I had to spend to decontaminate a property with a Level of 13ug, didn't need to happen?

Heartland Bank - Online 6.69
Unity 6.99
SBS FirstHome Combo 7.05
ICBC 7.05
China Construction Bank 7.09
Co-operative Bank - First Home Special 7.09
Wairarapa Building Society 7.15
ANZ Special 7.24
Westpac Special 7.29
ASB Bank 7.29
BNZ - Classic 7.29
Unity First Home Buyer special 6.45
Heartland Bank - Online 6.45
TSB Special 6.75
China Construction Bank 6.75
ANZ Special 6.79
Unity 6.85
BNZ - Classic 6.85
ICBC 6.85
ASB Bank 6.85
Wairarapa Building Society 6.85
Westpac Special 6.89
Westpac Special 6.39
China Construction Bank 6.40
ICBC 6.49
BNZ - Classic 6.55
ASB Bank 6.55
SBS Bank Special 6.59
Kiwibank Special 6.59
AIA - Go Home Loans 6.69
Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 6.75
TSB Special 6.79
Westpac 6.99
SBS FirstHome Combo 6.19
AIA - Back My Build 6.19
ANZ Blueprint to Build 7.39
Credit Union Auckland 7.70
ICBC 7.85
Heartland Bank - Online 7.99
Pepper Money Essential 8.29
Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 8.40
Co-operative Bank - Standard 8.40
First Credit Union Standard 8.50
Kiwibank 8.50

More Stories

BREAKING: OCR 5.50% - Monetary Policy remains restrictive

Wednesday, February 28th 2024

BREAKING: OCR 5.50% - Monetary Policy remains restrictive

The Monetary Policy Committee today agreed to hold the Official Cash Rate (OCR) at 5.50%.

Sales dive to new depths – lending at low DTIs

Wednesday, February 21st 2024

Sales dive to new depths – lending at low DTIs

House sales have plunged to their second lowest level in about 40 years, only 2% up on January’s sales last year, which were the lowest since 1983.

DTIs will have no significant impact on house prices immediately

Tuesday, January 23rd 2024

DTIs will have no significant impact on house prices immediately

The Reserve Bank doesn't expect its proposed DTI restrictions to have a significant impact on house prices in the short-term.

RBNZ gives details of new lending rules

Tuesday, January 23rd 2024

RBNZ gives details of new lending rules

The Reserve Bank has reveled its proposed debt-to-income (DTI) restrictions alongside plans to loosen loan to value ratios (LVR) for residential lending.