COMMENT: Setting policies good practice for landlords

Landlords need to establish strict policies around their rental properties rather than just winging it, Auckland Property Investors Association vice president Peter Lewis believes…

Tuesday, December 04th 2018

During our everyday lives we all need to interact with many businesses. As such, we will have invariably come across statements such as “Our policy is . . .” and “In order to comply with our policy, you must . . .”

This is good business practice. By establishing a pre-set group of specific policies a business ensures that all customers are treated equally, that there is a standard response to commonly occurring situations, and the business is unlikely to be accused of breaking the law.

So when you operate your residential landlording business do you have a set of policies in place, or do you just wing it depending on the day and the mood?

Even if you work as a solo landlord it is good practice to formalise and codify your policies. These could cover a wide range of activities – including property purchases, tenant selection and management and how you decide to retain or dispose of a particular investment property.

As a landlord, my policy is to look at a property for sale on the basis of its actual or potential cash flow. A property might be an ideal development site or a great renovate and flick deal, but I will reject all such properties if they fail to measure up under my personal plan of buy, hold long-term, and rent.

This, of course, saves me a lot of time: I can reject 99.9% of properties that are on the market after just a few clicks of my calculator. Your particular requirements may be different, but that’s OK as they suit your needs not mine.

Similarly, I have a specific policy when I select tenants. Any tenants that do not measure up get my “I have to advise that your application was unsuccessful” response.

I would sooner keep the rental vacant than allow someone who does not comply with my requirements take over the property. That’s because in the past I have sometimes compromised and almost every time I have done so I have regretted it.

The best assessment of someone’s future behaviour is how they have behaved in the past. People make promises that they will improve, that they realise now that they need to pay their bills, or will no longer annoy their neighbours. But few are able to carry these good intentions through to a long-term behaviour change.

For me the biggest advantage of setting policies for your business is that it makes you think. It saves you from having to make hasty decisions under pressure and without time to consider the implications.

Forward planning allows you to consider how you want your rentals to run and to draw up policies to help this happen. It is something that many people ignore to their own detriment – and yet it does pay dividends.

Having strict policies in place, and sticking to them, means you also have a firm response to various requests that come your way. For example, when signing up a new tenant, I often get asked “If we mow the lawns ourselves, can we get a reduction in the rent?” I am able to respond “Our policy is that all lawns are mown by contractors whom we pay, so we are not able to offer that option”.

This response is invariably accepted without further argument. People seem to be willing to accept a policy that is firmly stated and consistently applied.

Any policies do need to be updated to reflect current economic conditions and legislative developments. For example, when selecting tenants I used to discount any minor bad debts, like defaulted cell-phone or power accounts, from over five years ago if the applicant had had a clean credit history since.

However, because Minister Twyford is making it much harder for landlords to remove unsatisfactory tenants from a property, I have amended my tenant selection policy. Now, any recorded bad debts at all at any time means an instant fail. Only perfect tenants will, in the future, have any chance of gaining the tenancy.

Similar policies need to be formulated and applied to 14-day breach notices and termination proceedings. I work on the basis that any tenant might fail to keep the terms of the tenancy once and, if they do so, I will work with them to help overcome that hurdle.

However, if they fall from grace a second time, that rings the alarm bell and I will work towards removing them from the tenancy. Bad behaviour becomes a habit. So, when trouble strikes, I ask “Do I want these people to stay, or would it be better for all of our sakes if they went elsewhere?” The answer to that question will then determine the actions I take.

Tenants are my customers and, like any business, I prefer customers that are easy to deal with, understand and accept their rights and responsibilities and, yes, return the most profit with the minimum amount of my time and effort.

I am not a social worker or a charity. Like most private landlords I am in this business for the rewards it can offer me. Within what is legal and acceptable, I will set policies that allow me to offer a good service to my tenants and also provide a fair reward to me for my time and effort.

It needs to be a win-win situation and I will continue to set policies that allow me to achieve this outcome.


On Wednesday, December 05th 2018 1:22 pm John Butt said:

I fully endorse this comment :-)

On Wednesday, December 05th 2018 1:32 pm Janice111 said:

Common sense made known. Unfortunately common sense isn't applied as much as it should be. Landlord's can be lazy and not do due diligence and take tenants on face value. That's the old fashioned way of doing it and everyone is going to have to step up to the plate and get with it. The government is putting in steps to get rid of the sloppiness and make the whole situation more transparent so everyone will know where they are with the new guidelines. It will make tenants be less unrelible and landlords be more accountable and careful of who let in as it could be difficult to evict them in future. Hopefully the government doesn't get too silly with changes and make it too draconian and put's off landlording as a business.

On Wednesday, December 05th 2018 1:53 pm C MacIntosh said:

Great business practice. Are you able to share some of your policies for rental? I am going to start making a set of policies for taking tenants in with impending legislation that would make getting rid of "bad tenant".

On Wednesday, December 05th 2018 3:49 pm Michaeljakob said:

Good business model Peter but most of us use professional, for want of another word, letting agents who are little more than money collectors and who mostly allow your hard work be to ruined without taking any responsibility. At the same time you get to pay agents up to 15% for the privilege of having bad tenants as well as a commission on repairs which seems to come every other day. So what are you paying management fees for???? We'll exit this market in the next 12 months. As others do likewise the rental industry will pay the price for poor management and rents will go up as the supply side diminishes. Government agencies have their part to play as well with never ending sugar coating for tenants who are becoming royalty with a growing list of rights and a decreasing list of responsibilities with tribunals to attack those nasty landlords. Good luck with your business. We're pretty well done. I can get a better return with a heck of a lot less stress, loss and expense.

On Thursday, December 06th 2018 10:23 am Loui said:

I use a landlord business tool Namecheck.co.nz to tenant check and credit check all my keen applicants. Just seeing the Namecheck credit authority forms has had those who know they have a bad credit rating, state upfront that they are unlikely to be considered and thank me for my time showing them through...this surprises me but the majority of tenants are well aware private landlords check prospective tenants ( though they are not aware we meeting our landlord obligations for our insurance cover)

Heartland Bank - Online 1.99
Kainga Ora - First Home Buyer Special 2.25
HSBC Premier 2.25
ICBC 2.45
Westpac Special 2.49
SBS Bank Special 2.49
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 2.49
BNZ - Classic 2.49
ASB Bank 2.49
ANZ Special 2.49
TSB Special 2.49
HSBC Premier 2.35
Heartland Bank - Online 2.35
ICBC 2.45
TSB Special 2.49
ASB Bank 2.59
SBS Bank Special 2.65
Kiwibank Special 2.65
China Construction Bank Special 2.65
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 2.69
AIA 2.69
Westpac Special 2.69
HSBC Premier 2.89
SBS Bank Special 2.99
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 2.99
AIA 2.99
Westpac Special 2.99
BNZ - Classic 2.99
ICBC 2.99
ASB Bank 2.99
China Construction Bank Special 2.99
Kiwibank Special 3.19
TSB Special 3.19
Heartland Bank - Online 2.50
Resimac 3.39
Kiwibank - Offset 3.40
Kiwibank 3.40
Kiwibank Special 3.40
Bluestone 3.49
ICBC 3.69
Heartland 3.95
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 4.40
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 4.40
Kainga Ora 4.43

More Stories

Just 14 days until new healthy homes standards kick in

Tuesday, November 17th 2020

Just 14 days until new healthy homes standards kick in

It is just two weeks now until healthy homes standards compliance statement need to be included in new or renewed tenancy agreements.

Reserve Bank looks to bring back lending restrictions

Wednesday, November 11th 2020

Reserve Bank looks to bring back lending restrictions

The Reserve Bank plans to reintroduce loan to value ratio restrictions on mortgage borrowers from March next year following a surge in the housing market.

Tribunal divvies up blame in maintenance ruling

Friday, November 06th 2020

Tribunal divvies up blame in maintenance ruling

New Zealand’s aging housing stock and tradition of informal landlord-tenant relationships have the potential for complex disputes where fault lies with both parties – as illustrated by a recent Tenancy Tribunal ruling.

COMMENT: The importance of correct structuring

Thursday, November 05th 2020

COMMENT: The importance of correct structuring

Structuring the ownership of a property portfolio is rarely the first – or even the second - thought for new investors. But it should be, argues property accountant Anthony Appleton-Tattersall*.