Property Management

Insulation benefits might be exaggerated

Anticipated benefits of insulation may have been dramatically inflated – thanks to a calculation error, an economist claims.

Tuesday, February 23rd 2016

The government’s Residential Tenancies Amendment Bill, which is currently at the Select Committee stage, will make it compulsory for landlords to install insulation in rental properties.

By 1 July 2019, all rental housing will need to have ceiling and underfloor insulation – unless it is physically impractical to install it.

The Bill has been controversial, largely because there are many who do not believe it goes far enough in terms of enforcing minimum standards for rental properties.

However, now a Wellington economist has claimed that the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment exaggerated the cost benefits of the policy.

In a new report, Tailrisk Economics principal Ian Harrison said there was a serious calculation error in the key study which underpinned the cost benefit calculation.

“The annual benefit of insulation was accidentally converted into a present value twice, massively increasing measured benefits.”

After correcting for this major error and taking a more realistic view of the benefit estimates in other studies, the net benefits of $630 million disappear, he said.

“The $600 million insulation investment will probably generate benefits of closer to $170 million, for an economic loss of $430 million.

“The benefits are 28 cents for each dollar spent on insulation, not $2.10.”

Harrison said the loss – which is likely to fall on tenants who will be hit with higher rents - could be substantially reduced by dropping the underfloor insulation requirement.

He also said there was little robust evidence that the insulation requirements will materially improve health outcomes.

Building and Housing Minster Nick Smith and MBIE have dismissed Harrison’s findings.

Both Smith and the MBIE said they stood by the original calculations of the benefits of rental housing insulation.

However, Taxpayers’ Union executive director Jordan Williams pointed out that Harrison had previously questioned the government’s analysis of earthquake prone building risk.

“Since then, the government has completely changed course, thanks largely to Mr Harrison’s advice being accepted as correct.”

In his view, Harrison’s findings showed there was a basic mix-up of the figure MBIE plugged into its cost benefit modelling.

“It seems highly unlikely that the government would have plowed ahead with the new insulation requirements had Ministers had the correct figures,” he said.

“Their decision last year imposes costs of some $430 million even after the benefits of the scheme are factored in. That’s an enormous regulatory tax on New Zealand landlords and renters at the very time housing is too expensive.”

Williams said someone should be held accountable for the error.

Comments

On Friday, February 26th 2016 6:19 pm Jpaynter said:

Another problem with too much insulation is that it can have the opposite affect of that intended. It can impede airflow, increasing water retention and mould in homes. Another piece of stupidity in the way of regulations has just come to light. Now Body Corporate Administrators are wanting us to employ 'properly qualified' risk assessors to write risk reports for contractors etc coming onto properties to maintain the likes of blocks of flats. Quite apart from the obvious of falling off the roof, getting hit by moving cars and electrocuted by cutting into live wires, what needs to be written. No doubt the reports will not be cheap and will once again increase the cost of housing to owners, landlords and tenants.

On Monday, February 29th 2016 11:34 pm Peter L said:

The other point of interest is that the costs fall on the property owner but the savings accrue to the Government. Hardly a fair call.

Heartland Bank - Online 6.69
SBS FirstHome Combo 6.74
Wairarapa Building Society 6.95
Unity 6.99
Co-operative Bank - First Home Special 7.04
ICBC 7.05
China Construction Bank 7.09
BNZ - Classic 7.24
ASB Bank 7.24
ANZ Special 7.24
TSB Special 7.24
Unity First Home Buyer special 6.45
Heartland Bank - Online 6.45
China Construction Bank 6.75
TSB Special 6.75
ICBC 6.75
ANZ Special 6.79
ASB Bank 6.79
AIA - Go Home Loans 6.79
Kiwibank Special 6.79
BNZ - Classic 6.79
Unity 6.79
Westpac Special 6.39
China Construction Bank 6.40
ICBC 6.49
SBS Bank Special 6.55
Kiwibank Special 6.55
BNZ - Classic 6.55
Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 6.55
ASB Bank 6.55
AIA - Go Home Loans 6.55
TSB Special 6.59
Kainga Ora 6.99
SBS FirstHome Combo 6.19
AIA - Back My Build 6.19
ANZ Blueprint to Build 7.39
Credit Union Auckland 7.70
ICBC 7.85
Heartland Bank - Online 7.99
Pepper Money Essential 8.29
Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 8.40
Co-operative Bank - Standard 8.40
First Credit Union Standard 8.50
Kiwibank 8.50

More Stories

Support for regulation

Monday, March 18th 2024

Support for regulation

REINZ has emphasised the need for property management regulation to Parliament’s Social Services and Community Committee.

A better investment market

Thursday, March 14th 2024

A better investment market

“Reinstatement of interest deductibility starting from the new tax year on 1 April brings property investors back in line with every other business in the country, where interest costs are a legitimate deductible expense," Tim Horsbrugh, New Zealand Property Investors Federation (NZPIF) executive committee member says.

[OPINION] Recessionary times

Thursday, March 14th 2024

[OPINION] Recessionary times

It is not the best out there for many businesses and property sector people. Sales are down across the board, our clients’ confidence is falling, and there is a lot of uncertainty.

Interest rate expectations: It’s not over yet

Thursday, March 07th 2024

Interest rate expectations: It’s not over yet

Most Kiwis think interest rate increases have peaked.