Flight to mortgage 'haven'
Monday 6 September 2004
Well-structured contributory mortgages are taking off, writes Garry Sheeran.
By The LandlordWhether moving money from risky debenture stocks to contributory mortgages is out of the frying pan and into the fire usually depends on the type of contributory mortgage.
In recent years the Securities Commission has nailed the activities of people peddling contributory mortgages schemes which bent the rules. It's estimated investors have either lost, or had returned late, around $100 million from such dodgy contributory mortgage schemes.
As a result, these products have all but disappeared, and no one (apart from their former promoters) is bemoaning their demise.
However, contributory mortgages as a genre are alive and well and have a good reputation - ie, those structured as unit trusts, with plenty of safeguards built in.
These do the same thing: break up mortgages worth several hundred thousand dollars or more into small chunks. They then sell those chunks on to a pool of small investors who own what is a blue-chip, "safe as houses" investment.
The big difference between the two types of schemes is the number of mortgages in each.
Read More - Opens in a new window
Commenting is closed
Getting rid of “no cause” termination notices only serves to protect bad tenants and will have a negative impact on the broader community, not just landlords, according to landlord advocates.
Vacancy rates in the commercial property sector are set to increase as changing economic conditions dampen demand.
LVR restrictions were never meant to be a permanent feature of New Zealand’s housing market and ANZ economists argue that some further relaxing of them could soon be on the cards.