Better to be safe, but not too safe - Mary Holm
Friday 9 April 2004
Q. Many people would agree with your "house built on an old tip site" buyer, that one should carry out careful checks before a major purchase. But why stop with the council?
To be really safe you should also have structural, plumbing, drainage, electrical, groundwater, geological reports and probably a cultural audit would be wise too (though this may be no longer necessary "po
By The Landlordst Brash"?) It is true that any specific problem could have been avoided if one had checked for it in advance. But at what cost?
I'm semi-retired and most of my friends are nearing that stage, and your article started me thinking back.
I observe that those who have lived cautious lives have not had noticeably fewer problems than those who were more impulsive, the reverse actually. And the cautious are generally poorer.
I don't think this is due to chance, rather it is that the cost of missed opportunities is much greater than the cost of overcoming mistakes.
Life is full of uncertainty, and attempts to make it less so rapidly come to cost more than the benefit. Too much insurance guarantees you'll stay poor.
Read More - Opens in a new window
Commenting is closed
A property trader, who has attracted unfavourable media attention in recent years, has received a formal warning from the Commerce Commission.
There’s no sign of a slow-down in Wellington’s property prices with Trade Me Property’s latest data showing that asking prices continue to rise solidly.
Vacancy rates in the commercial property sector are set to increase as changing economic conditions dampen demand.
LVR restrictions were never meant to be a permanent feature of New Zealand’s housing market and ANZ economists argue that some further relaxing of them could soon be on the cards.