(updated on Wednesday, March 07th 2018)
I am aware of the tenancy decision where a tenant caused a fire and was not liable as it was an accident. I'm just wondering would the decision be different if the tenant was using a gas cooker (which is not provided by landlord, and is against council regulations) on the stove top?
Our Experts Answer:
It is difficult to predict what would be the result of a different scenario without having access to all the facts. The case of Holler & Rouse v Osaki was about damage unintentionally caused by a tenant where the landlord is covered by insurance. In those circumstances the Court decided that a residential tenant has the same protection as a commercial tenant under the Property Law Act 2007.
You have not said whether your tenant has caused a fire, or whether you are simply exploring the possibility. In this instance I cannot give you an answer. It depends on the decision of the Tenancy Tribunal in a given fact situation.
|Heartland Bank - Online||1.99|
|The Co-operative Bank - First Home Special||2.09|
|Kainga Ora - First Home Buyer Special||2.25|
|The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ||2.29|
|SBS Bank Special||2.29|
|Heartland Bank - Online||2.35|
|SBS Bank Special||2.49|
|The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ||2.59|
|BNZ - Classic||2.59|
|China Construction Bank Special||2.65|
|China Construction Bank Special||2.99|
|BNZ - Classic||2.99|
|SBS Bank Special||3.19|
|The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ||3.19|
|Heartland Bank - Online||2.50|
|Kiwibank - Offset||3.40|
|Select Home Loans||3.49|
|The Co-operative Bank - Standard||4.40|
|The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ||4.40|